There’s a ton of literature and webpages about colourschemes, and both you and I have better things to do than studying all of them. In the following, therefore, I’ll try to assemble a simple, logical theory of colourschemes that doesn’t take an entire book to explain.

First premise:
There are basically four parameters you can adjust when it comes to colourschemes:

• Contrast: How complementary are the colours?
• Balance: How much are there of each colour compared to the others?
• Position: How are the colours positioned?
• Colour saturation/hue/shading: Strengthening, weakening or altering the individual colours.

Listed in order of importance: for instance, use of the last parameter when building with Lego is severely limited by the available palette)

Second premise:
Depending on how you vary the parameters, the colourscheme will vary between static/dynamic and boring/confusing: The goal is to hit the golden mean where everything is just right (I just recycled a part of my design theory for this one).

First parameter: Contrast (complementary colours)
Theory: Harmonious colourschemes are based on a kind of idealized colouring that; for instance, make flower paintings prettier than the real thing. According to Goethe & co this is because the brain wish to compensate or balance out dominating colours:

If you look at something red, the brain wants green (complementary or opposite colours on the colour-wheel), if you look at heavily saturated red, it wants lighter tones also (opposite saturation), and if the colour is shaded with grey or black, the brain wish to balance this as well.

Returning to the second premise, we don’t want to make things too pretty because it’ll end up too boring, on the other hand, we don’t want it too provoking either, cause at the other end of the scale the colourscheme just collapses into a complete mess.

Since it’s really easy to screw things up, so your best bet is probably to aim at “harmonious with a little twist” – or at least start out from there.

Practice: Somewhat similar to your colour television, the contrast button basically goes from weak greyscale to strong pairs of complementary colours:

Dual complementary colourscheme: Starting at the strong end of the contrast-scale, the dual complementary colourscheme is probably as harsh as it gets, especially if the colours are placed right next to each other.

Tetrad colourschemes: Made out of two pairs of complementary colours with equal distance on the colour-wheel. These colourschemes should combine prettiness (because they contain all the primary colours) with double complementarity. With a twelve-colour colour-wheel, you’ll unfortunately end up with one primary, one secondary and two of the extremely rare tertiary colours.

Split complementary colourshemes: Basically the same as duals, only you’ve split one of the colours into the two neighbouring colours on the colour-wheel in order to water down the contrast.

Triad colourschemes: Made out of three colours with equal distance on the colour-wheel. Pretty because they, like tetrad schemes, contain all of the primary colours, but less contrasting because none of them are directly complementary.

Non-complementary colourschemes: Naturally, colourschemes doesn’t have to be based on complementary pairs of colour. If they’re placed more than 60 degrees from each other on the colour-wheel you might achieve an elegant semi-complementary scheme, because primary and secondary colours from opposite sides of the wheel will be contained within the colours chosen. The same goes for earth tones, as these are based on all three primary colours.
If the colours are placed less than 60 degrees from each other, you could argue that we’re really talking about analogous colourschemes instead:

Analogous colourschemes: Are based on colours sitting close to each other on the colour-wheel such as yellow green, yellow, yellow orange and orange. While this kind of scheme will create pleasing variations in what would usually be one colour + greyscale, they lack the true dynamism of a complementary colourscheme.

One colour + greyscale: One step above plain greyscale, a single colour can add a splash of life that these colourschemes usually lack:

Greyscale colourschemes: With greyscale you can still get a heavy light-dark contrast, however, without the liveliness of colours, most of these schemes end up being either dull greyish or confusing zebra-schemes that are particularly difficult to photograph.

Ok, I haven’t had time to write or photograph more, so instead of dragging things out for several weeks and hit you over the head with a huge(r) blogpost, I’ll cut it off here.
In the following blogposts I plan to continue with the other parameters (balance, positioning, and saturation/hue/shading), followed by a small series of posts with examples of spacemocs announced on CSF (hopefully Jainsguide/CSF moc announcements are back up soon).

I don’t know how widespread Tetra Pak containers are outside Northern Europe, but if you can get your hand on some (or something similar), they can easily be converted to really handy sorting bins.

I’ve added an article about it to the page.

Finally got around uploading my Cave Racer from more than two months ago:

I really liked this fad, but I’ve been so much out of the loop that I don’t even know if it’s still running…

So why do we dislike certain colours while constantly using others?
In one of the books I’ve borrowed*, the second task after creating a colour-wheel is to paint two squares, one with the colours we like, and the other with the ones we don’t.

I just did the excercise this morning and would sincerely hope you’ll try it out too: If you’re like me, you use certain colours way too much, while others are collecting dust in the boxes - concience about which and why is the first step to remedy the problem, either experimenting more or simply stocking up on certain colours.
Anyways, here’s mine: because comparative rarity of certain colours and part availability, I ended up parting it up in 5 categories instead of the original 2:

Doing the exercise made me realize a couple of very interesting things:

• While I don’t really dislike any colours in particular, I do tend to prefer greyscale and more somber earth-tones (or guaches) - I believe this is because I haven’t really made any ‘real’ colourschemes yet:
• The fact that I group most of the primary and secondary colours in the “too powerful for spaceship”-category - I’m pretty sure that this is because the majority of my later spaceships have usually been “one-colour+greyscale”: Especially primary colours ARE very dominant on their own, and the only reason I’ve even considered using red is probably because we’re used to sportscars of that colour. However, beside the culturally accepted “signal colours” for sportscars, construction equipment etc., it ought to be possible to use the primary and secondary colours in quite large quantities if they’re combined with sufficient amounts of greyscale, complementary, and/or analogue colours (colours next to eachother).
• Most of the tertiary colours end up in the lighter pastel-colour group: Usually it’s not possible to create colourschemes based on these colours because they’re rare, and because you usually can’t even get the nessecary parts in the most basic part categories: bricks, plates, slopes, and tiles.
  In principle, you can use them for analogous colourschemes, but these will often end up looking pretty “splotchy” because the gaps in the part-palettes makes it hard to group the individual parts together - and since they often look a lot like a primary or secondary colour anyways, it’s often a lot easier to just use that instead.

Next time we’ll take a look at how you can use the colour-wheel to create harmonious colourschemes:
If you haven’t build one yet, hurry back to the previous post to see how, place it where you’ll see it as much as possible (I’ve added an 2×3 black brick behind the purple so it can stand upright), and try to learn it by heart.

* Betty Edwards 2004: Color - A course in mastering the art of mixing colors

So, why do you want to make a colour-wheel, how does it work, and how can you make one out of lego yourself?

Personally I’ve had a too strong tendency to consider colours as a linear scale, usually from red to purple (which may be because I’ve gotten used to stacking bricks).
Although rainbow-scales are pretty to look at and good for analogous colourschemes made out of bright colours (like yellow-orange-red), they won’t help you if you wish to work with the much more effectful contrasting colourschemes (or understanding more complex colours such as tan: yellow, orange, and a pinch of blue or dark red: red with pinches of yellow and blue).

Picture time! Here’s the colour-wheel I made just after returning home for the weekend:

Â

Contrasting colours are the ones sitting opposite eachother, like red/green, yellow/orange etc. An interesting fact is that if you mix up all primary colours you’ll get brownish colours - if it’s possible to consider a colourscheme as a “unified” colour, this may explain why “rainbow-warrior”-schemes are generally frowned upon - because it ends up messy or muddy.
The colour-wheel might help you create the much talked about 3-colour-scheme, if you consider each of the primary colours as primary, secondary and accent (I haven’t actually tested this yet, but I’m fairly sure it should work pretty well).

Enough talk for today, here’s the reverse of my colour-wheel so you can build one yourself:

Â

Ah well, a little more ;)Â - tertiary colours are named after the primary colour and secondary colour next to it - ie. yellow-orange, for instance, is the one between yellow and orange.
I’ve used the following lego-colours for tertiary colours (counter clockwise): acid green (yellow-green), teal (blue-green), royal blue (blue-purple), light purple (red-purple) and earth orange (red-orange), and light orange (yellow-orange).

I’m definitly not satisfied with the royal blue (colour seem ok, but it’s too light) and earth orange (too muddy: must have some blue in there) - If you have any better suggestions, I’d love to see a picture.

The yellow colour in the last blogpost reminded me that I’ve actually promised myself a brush up on colour theory during the summer holliday, as this is something I need to be a lot more concious about when working with webdesign, and especially lego mocs.

So this weekend I actually went over to the libary and borrowed two books on colour theory (and one on English grammar, you’d probably like that ;) ).
I hope to enter a whole new phase in my development as a builder, experimenting with harmonious and contrasting colours etc.

According to Betty Edwards*, you have to create a colour wheel and learn it by heart to get anywhere with colourscheme, so now I’ve changed the bacground image on my desktop to a colour-wheel - why not use the space for something that might actually make you smarter?

I just wish somebody like Mark Sandlin would make a slightly larger version, perhaps 600×600 with a nice neutral background: I really liked his Classic Space Logo, but I can’t seem to find it in his flickr-account :(

When I return to my lego in the weekend, I’ll try to make a colour-wheel out of lego for reference when building.

* Betty Edwards 2004: Color - A course in mastering the art of mixing colors

Evolution from the Z3: Instead of just minimizing the cockpit vertically, I’ve also sliced a good third of it here. The curve is also smoother (there’s going to be similar curves on the sides of the engine section.

Status 1½ month ago: Originally I’d made a fancy bridge between the cockpit and gun-sections so that the engine could pivot around the dishes (I just stitched the craft together to take a few shots during the Z3-photoshoot), but it was really hard to integrate, and the craft would end up too wide:

Status weekend before last: After experimeting with various unsuccesfull designs all morning, until I ended up with this. Originally I planned to exchange the yellow fins for black or white ones, but they’ve kinda grown on me since then, so I think I’ll try to make a real colourscheme this time (more about that in the next blogpost)!

I just discovered that, the page has passed hit 100.000 with above 33.000 unique visitors during the last couple of days… I belive that it was 75.000 last time I checked, time certainly do fly!

Considering the fact that I’ve hardly build or uploaded anything to the page since last summer, I’m surprised at the number of hits reached so early in the year…

Now I wonder how I can display a visible counter…

<- EDIT: Right there, below the random image on the left, and now you can even look at my stats yourself

I’ll use it to announce uploads and updates to the page, random thoughts about lego, and occasionally photos of design-sketches and progress-shots of wips.

I hope some lighter and more frequent contents will make the page more lively.

Next project: Organizing the navbar so you’re actually able to find stuff